SAF Scarcity + MRV Pressure Creates the tLCAF Window.
SAF will not be available at scale or at reasonable cost in time for the first non‑CO₂ reports. tLCAF offers a refinery‑based, scalable path to contrail and SOx mitigation at a demo‑phase cost of 2.5× Jet A‑1, competitive against SAF and many avoidance strategies.
Why SAF and Rerouting Cannot Carry the Load
Market ConstraintsSAF: Supply-Side Failure
📉- Forecast 2025: ~1.9 million tonnes, only ~0.6% of global demand.
- Price Premium: 2–5× Jet A‑1, higher in mandated markets.
- Blend Wall: Most pathways capped at 50% for seal integrity.
Navigational Avoidance
✈️- CO₂ Penalty: Typically 0.5–2% extra fuel burn.
- Capacity Crunch: Widespread rerouting can reduce airspace capacity by up to 20%.
- Uncertainty: Forecast errors produce costly diversions with no benefit.
Mitigation Strategies Per Tonne
Comparative Economics| Strategy | Cost Basis | Non‑CO₂ Benefit | CO₂ Impact | 2025 Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jet A‑1 (Baseline) | ~$700/tonne | None (High Impact) | Baseline | High (Penalized) |
| SAF (HEFA) | ~$2,500–$3,000 | High Reduction | Lifecycle Reduction | Low (Supply <1%) |
| Navigational Avoidance | ~$1.75–$14 / tCO₂e | High Potential | Positive Penalty | Low (ATC Limits) |
| tLCAF (Demo Phase) | ~$1,750/tonne (≈2.5×) | High (Contrails & SOx) | Neutral | High (Drop-In) |
From Demo Premium to Cost Parity
Scale EconomicsPilot Phase: Demo Pricing
Current StateDuring the flight demonstration phase, tLCAF carries an expected premium of about 2.5× Jet A‑1 to cover small‑batch production and test costs. Grants and cost‑sharing arrangements can absorb a significant portion of this delta for launch partners.
Refinery Scale: Cost Parity
Target StateThe underlying production model is refinery‑based, not feedstock‑limited. At scale, the target is cost parity with fossil Jet A‑1, unlike SAF pathways that structurally sit at 2–4× price multiples due to constrained feedstocks and complex supply chains.